On 10 August 2026, representatives from the National Innovation Agency (NIA) visited the office of Legal Advance Solution Co., Ltd. (LAS) to review the progress and development of the Kelomn.com platform. Dr. Thundthornthep Yamoutai, Managing Partner, together with the LAS team, presented the latest updates and milestones achieved.
Kelomn.com is an AI Legal Research platform funded by NIA's national innovation grant program, built on the concept of "Knowledge Base Business Law for the Business Life." The platform is now partially operational, offering features including a Supreme Court Judgment search system, Royal Gazette monitoring for new legislation, and Kelomn Tax Intelligence for tax ruling research.
The visit was part of NIA's ongoing project monitoring process, aimed at assessing progress and exchanging feedback for the next phase of development.
LAS and Kelomn.com express sincere gratitude to NIA for their continued support and trust, and reaffirm their commitment to advancing legal technology innovation to make law more accessible for all Thai people.
Dr. Thundthornthep Yamoutai
Legal Advance Solution / LAS
[email protected]ฟ
Kudun & Partners Co., Ltd. (KAP) and Legal Advance Solution Co., Ltd. (LAS) collaborate under “AEGIZ – Medical & Health Law” to provide specialized legal advisory services for medical and healthcare businesses. The collaboration aims to support doctors, healthcare professionals, and entrepreneurs in establishing, operating, and expanding their businesses with confidence.
AEGIZ emphasizes legal planning alongside business development, taking into account the operations and objectives of each business. Its approach focuses on providing advice aligned with the needs of businesses at each stage of growth.
The scope of advisory services covers medical products, hospitals, clinics, aesthetic centers, healthcare services, and healthcare real estate development. It also extends to doctors and healthcare professionals seeking to establish their own ventures or expand their business activities.
Through AEGIZ, KAP and LAS aim to help clients build legal foundations aligned with their business direction and support careful planning and informed decision-making, from business formation and day-to-day operations to long-term expansion.
Through this collaboration, LAS remains committed to developing specialized legal advisory services that enable medical and healthcare entrepreneurs to focus on service development and business growth with a sound legal foundation.
Legal Advance Solution Co., Ltd.
Ms. Nanthanat Saengthong, Partner, and Mr. Kasidit Chumsawat, Senior Associate, of Legal Advance Solution Co., Ltd. (LAS), were honored to speak on the law of real estate leasehold rights (Sap Ing Sit) at the Thailand Property Rights Seminar 2026, organized by Honour Thailand and ONCE Wongamat, a super-luxury condominium project. The seminar took place on Thursday, 2 October 2026, at 13:00 in the Grand Ballroom, 7th Floor, Siamese Hotel Pattaya.
Following the earlier seminar in Bangkok, the Pattaya edition, themed “Enhancing Real Estate Legal Knowledge to Strengthen Confidence in Advising Clients,” welcomed more than 400 attendees.
The LAS session covered key topics including understanding real estate leasehold rights, legal points to know for sales, the differences between leasehold and freehold ownership, and presenting to Thai and foreign clients, and concluded with a Q&A session with the speakers.
LAS is honored by the continued trust of Honour Thailand and ONCE Wongamat in inviting the firm once again to share its real estate legal knowledge, and remains committed to supporting the real estate industry with ongoing legal expertise.
Dr. Thundthornthep Yamoutai, Managing Partner of Legal Advance Solution Co., Ltd. (LAS), received a royally bestowed Advanced Certificate and Academic Pin from the Political Party and Election Academy, as a graduate of the Advanced Programme on Political Development and Elections, at the ceremony held on Friday, 11 September 2026, at Dusidala Hall, Chitralada Palace, Dusit Palace, Bangkok.
LAS is deeply honored and extends its warmest congratulations to Dr. Thundthornthep Yamoutai on this prestigious occasion.
Padcha Suvapiromchote
[email protected]
Ms. Nanthanat Saengthong, Partner, and Mr. Kasidit Chumsawat, Associate, of Legal Advance Solution Co., Ltd. (LAS), were invited as guest speakers at the Thailand Property Rights Seminar 2026, organized by ONCE Wongamat, to deliver a session on the fundamentals of property rights law in Thailand.
The seminar was designed to enhance legal knowledge in real estate for property agents, sales representatives, and professionals in the real estate industry equipping them with the confidence to provide quality legal guidance to both Thai and international clients, covering key aspects of property rights that practitioners in the sector should understand.
LAS is honored by the trust placed in us by ONCE Wongamat to contribute to this knowledge-sharing initiative, and reaffirms its commitment to supporting the real estate industry with ongoing legal education and expertise.
Since 15 September 2026, injectable Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) drugs, commonly known as “weight-loss pens”, have been classified as specially controlled drugs under the Drug Act B.E. 2510 (1967). The change does not affect only pharmacies, which must now sell these drugs against a prescription. It affects the whole supply chain, from importers and wholesalers to the hospitals and clinics that purchase and dispense the drugs, and ultimately the patients who use them. This article summarizes what has changed, who is affected, and how to adapt.
What Has Changed
The Notification of the Ministry of Public Health Re: Specially Controlled Drugs (No. 58), dated 6 March 2026 and published in the Royal Gazette on 18 March 2026, adds “injectable Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) drugs” as item (100) of Clause 3 of the Notification of the Ministry of Public Health Re: Specially Controlled Drugs dated 26 May 1978 (B.E. 2521). The Notification takes effect upon the expiry of 180 days from the day following its publication in the Royal Gazette, and has therefore been in force since 15 September 2026 (Notification No. 58, Clauses 1 and 2).
In its press statement of 14 September 2026, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) cites Semaglutide and Liraglutide as examples of drugs in this group, and its release of 19 March 2026 also lists Dulaglutide, Lixisenatide and Tirzepatide. These drugs are indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, and some products for weight management in people with obesity, under a doctor’s diagnosis and prescription. The Notification covers only “injectable” forms, so operators holding products in other dosage forms should check the classification of each product.
The FDA explains that the measure responds to the use of these drugs for weight loss without medical assessment and supervision, the illegal sale of counterfeit drugs and drugs of unknown origin, and sales through online channels. At the same time, the FDA stresses that patients with a medical indication who are under a doctor’s care can still access the drugs as usual.
Who Is Affected
Once a drug becomes a specially controlled drug, everyone in the supply chain is affected, in particular:
• Importers and wholesalers, at the start of the supply chain, should tighten control of distribution so that the drugs reach only buyers permitted by law. In the first phase, the FDA has also asked import and sale licensees for GLP-1 drugs to report their sales data to its Track & Trace distribution-tracking system; this is currently a request for cooperation, not a legal duty.
• Hospitals, clinics and pharmacies, as the points where the drugs reach patients, should strengthen supplier vetting and keep clear sourcing records.
Note: Social media sellers and agents without a drug-selling licence have never been permitted to sell GLP-1 drugs, because no one may sell modern drugs without a licence. Violators face imprisonment of up to five years and a fine of up to THB 10,000 (Drug Act B.E. 2510, Sections 12 and 101).
Legal Requirements
The key duties for GLP-1 drugs are set out in the Drug Act B.E. 2510 and the Ministerial Regulation on Applications for and Issuance of Licences to Sell Modern Drugs B.E. 2556 (2013) (the “Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2556”), as follows.
1. Who may buy GLP-1 drugs
Who: The first-class pharmacist on duty at pharmacies and wholesale premises. Importers selling the drugs they import should follow the same rule, because the law deems them to hold a wholesale licence for those drugs and their pharmacist must control sales under Section 39 (Drug Act B.E. 2510, Section 15 paragraph two and Section 44 (4)).
What the law requires: GLP-1 drugs may be sold only to holders of a retail or wholesale licence to sell modern drugs, medical practitioners, dental practitioners or first-class veterinary practitioners, or against a prescription issued by a medical, dental or first-class veterinary practitioner.
Exception: In an emergency where necessary to protect a patient’s life, the first-class pharmacist may sell without a prescription under the conditions prescribed by the Minister.
Legal basis: Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2556, Clause 10 (5)
2. A pharmacist must be on duty whenever GLP-1 drugs are sold
Who: All licensees that sell the drugs, including pharmacies and wholesalers
What the law requires: A licensee may not sell GLP-1 drugs while the pharmacist is not on duty; violations are punishable by a fine of THB 1,000 to 5,000. In a pharmacy, the first-class pharmacist supervises the delivery of specially controlled drugs, and a second-class pharmacist may not sell or deliver them.
Legal basis: Drug Act B.E. 2510, Sections 32, 39 (6), 40 and 107
3. Sellers should not supply shops licensed for ready-packed drugs only
Who: Importers, wholesalers and pharmacies
What the law requires: A licence to sell only ready-packed modern drugs that are not dangerous drugs or specially controlled drugs does not cover specially controlled drugs, so its holder may not keep GLP-1 drugs for sale or sell them. Although the law does not expressly prohibit sellers from supplying such shops, in the author’s view, reading these provisions together with the list of permitted buyers in Clause 10 (5), sellers should not do so.
Legal basis: Drug Act B.E. 2510, Section 4 (definition of “sell”), Sections 12 and 15 (4); Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2556, Clause 10 (5)
4. Labels must show the words “specially controlled drug” in red
Who: Importers (labelling); pharmacies and wholesalers (keeping labels intact)
What the law requires: Importers must provide the required label from the time of import and, before offering the drugs for sale, ensure the label is complete, including the Thai words “ยาควบคุมพิเศษ” (“specially controlled drug”) in clearly visible red lettering and the importer’s name and the province where its import premises are located. Pharmacies and wholesalers must keep the labels intact.
Legal basis: Drug Act B.E. 2510, Sections 25 (3) (h), 26 (5), 26 bis and 27 (2)–(3)
5. Specially controlled drugs must be stored separately
Who: Pharmacies and wholesalers
What the law requires: Specially controlled drugs must be stored separately in their own section, apart from dangerous drugs and other drugs.
Legal basis: Drug Act B.E. 2510, Sections 26 (3) and 26 bis
6. Purchase and sale records must be complete
What the law requires: Importers must keep records of drugs imported and sold, and retain samples of imported drugs. All sale licensees, including pharmacies and wholesalers, must record every purchase (Form Khor.Yor. 9) and every sale of a specially controlled drug (Form Khor.Yor. 10) and keep these records for at least three years. Sales against a prescription must be recorded on Form Khor.Yor. 12; the prescription must be kept for at least one year and the record for at least three years from the date of sale.
Legal basis: Drug Act B.E. 2510, Sections 26 (6), 26 bis and 27 (6); Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2556, Clause 8 (5), (6) and (8)
7. Restrictions on advertising specially controlled drugs
Who: Anyone advertising drugs to the public
What the law requires: Advertising of GLP-1 drugs must not present the properties of specially controlled drugs and must not contain any certification or endorsement of a drug’s properties by another person. Neither prohibition applies to advertising made directly to practitioners of the art of healing, medical practitioners or veterinary practitioners. Advertising by radio, loudspeaker, television, projection or film, or in print also requires prior approval of the text, sound or images by the licensing authority and compliance with its conditions. Violations are punishable by a fine of up to THB 100,000.
Legal basis: Drug Act B.E. 2510, Section 88 (6) and (7) and final paragraph, Section 88 bis and Section 124
How Doctors, Hospitals and Clinics Should Adapt ?
1. Buy from licensees and have the ordering doctor’s credentials ready
The seller’s pharmacist must ensure that GLP-1 drugs are sold only to the persons listed in the Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2556, which include medical practitioners (Clause 10 (5)). Sellers may therefore ask healthcare facilities more often for documents confirming the identity of the ordering doctor. Having the doctor’s medical licence details ready in advance will help avoid purchasing delays.
2. Check the serial number of every box on receipt
The FDA allows authorized GLP-1 products to be verified by entering the serial number on the package in the “Track & Trace – pilot serialization-level drug products” menu on the FDA website. If no record is found or the details do not match, the FDA advises against use and asks that it be reported to the FDA hotline 1556. Healthcare facilities should therefore make this check a routine step on receiving stock, and keep purchase documents available for traceability.
3. Issue complete prescriptions when the patient will collect the drug at a pharmacy
A pharmacy may sell GLP-1 drugs to a patient only against a prescription from a medical or dental practitioner, and delivery must be supervised by a pharmacist (Drug Act B.E. 2510, Section 39 (6); Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2556, Clause 10 (5)). This matches the FDA’s message that a doctor’s prescription is required and that the drug must be handed over by a pharmacist.
For each prescription sale, the pharmacy must record the patient’s name, age and address and the prescriber’s name and address or workplace (Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2556, Clause 8 (8)). Prescriptions should therefore carry these details and identify the doctor clearly, as they are a key document for both the doctor and the pharmacy when a sale must be traced back.
4. Review posts, promotions and marketing that mention GLP-1 drugs
Drug advertising must not present the properties of GLP-1 drugs and must not contain any certification or endorsement by another person (Drug Act B.E. 2510, Section 88 (6) and (7)). Healthcare facilities should therefore review posts, service packages, promotions and reviews that refer to the effects of injectable GLP-1 drugs, whether published by the facility itself or through social-media influencers.
5. Prepare receipt and dispensing data for the tracking system
The FDA designed its Track & Trace system to follow a drug’s path from import to dispensing, so sellers may ask healthcare facilities for more receipt data. Facilities that start recording batch numbers, quantities received and quantities dispensed now will be ready when the FDA issues its criteria on sale and distribution, which it states are still being prepared.
In Summary
Now that the Notification is in force, healthcare operators should align their daily purchasing, storage and dispensing practices with the stricter requirements. Clinics, pharmacies and wholesalers should review agreements with their trading partners, verify serial numbers on receipt, and ensure every GLP-1 prescription is based on a physician’s assessment and supported by a medical record. Reviewing social media promotions is equally urgent, as advertising that presents the properties of a specially controlled drug or features third-party endorsements is prohibited (Drug Act B.E. 2510, Section 88 (6) and (7)).
Sources
Notification of the Ministry of Public Health Re: Specially Controlled Drugs (No. 58), dated 6 March 2026 (Royal Gazette Vol. 143, Special Part 71 Ng, p. 1, 18 March 2026)
Drug Act B.E. 2510 (1967), consolidated text as amended up to the Drug Act (No. 6) B.E. 2562 (2019) (Office of the Council of State)
Ministerial Regulation on Applications for and Issuance of Licences to Sell Modern Drugs B.E. 2556 (2013) (Royal Gazette Vol. 130, Part 126 Kor, 27 December 2013), as amended by the Ministerial Regulation (No. 2) B.E. 2561 (2018) (Royal Gazette Vol. 135, Part 76 Kor, 26 September 2018)
Thai Food and Drug Administration, press statement of 14 September 2026 on the control of weight-loss pens from 15 September (in Thai)
Thai Food and Drug Administration, news release of 19 March 2026 on the upgrading of injectable GLP-1 drugs to specially controlled drugs (in Thai)
Medicines Regulation Division, Thai Food and Drug Administration, summary table of specially controlled drugs (in Thai)
This article reflects the law and information available as at 24 October 2026.
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information only and does not constitute legal advice on any particular case. Readers should obtain advice on their own circumstances before acting.
Kasidit Chumsawat
When undertaking large-scale projects or bidding for contracts, business operators often face a critical decision: Joint Venture (JV) or Consortium? Both involve the collaboration of two or more parties, yet their legal implications differ significantly.
Joint Venture (JV)
A Joint Venture is a collaboration in which all parties operate as a single unified entity, with the following key characteristics:
Consortium
A Consortium is a collaboration in which each party is responsible solely for its own defined scope of work, with the following key characteristics:
Key Considerations for Business Owners
Selecting the wrong structure may expose the business to unnecessary legal risk — including liability, tax implications, and inter-party disputes. Business owners should carefully assess the nature of the project, the scope of work, and the relationship between the parties before making a decision, and consult with a business law advisor to determine the most appropriate structure.
This article is part of the LAS Legal Knowledge Hub — Learn more at kelomn.com
Thundthornthep Yamoutai
The Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued the Notification on Food Advertising Criteria B.E. 2569, effective 28 July 2026 (Royal Gazette Volume 143, Special Section 182 Ngor, Page 60, dated 27 July 2026).
The new regulation classifies food advertising into three categories with product-specific warning requirements, providing a clearer framework for business owners, brand operators, restaurants, and influencers to understand what can be posted freely, what requires prior approval, and what is strictly prohibited.
Three Categories of Food Advertising Under the New Rules
1. Prohibited
Content that is strictly forbidden by law, such as exaggerated health claims, misleading statements, or advertising that violates food safety regulations.
2. No Approval Required
Certain types of advertising may be published without prior FDA approval, provided they comply with the criteria specified in the notification.
3. Approval Required
Advertising that falls under the legally defined criteria must obtain FDA approval before publication.
Recommended Actions for Business Owners
Compliant advertising not only reduces legal risk but also builds long-term credibility for the business.
📖 Read more: kelomn.com/articles/food-advertising-rules-2569
This article is part of the LAS Legal Knowledge Hub
When a personal data breach occurs, many organizations assume that notification to the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) is mandatory in every case. In practice, the law does not require notification for every incident. PDPC Consultation No. 17/2567 provides clear guidance on when notification is and is not required.
1. When Notification Is Not Required
If the organization assesses the incident and determines that the breach does not pose a risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, notification to the PDPC is not required. However, the organization should document the incident and retain evidence of the assessment in the event of a subsequent review by the PDPC.
2. When Notification Is Required Within 72 Hours
If investigation confirms reasonable belief that a breach has occurred and poses a risk to data subjects' rights and freedoms, the organization must notify the PDPC within 72 hours from the point of confirmation. This is assessed on a case-by-case basis.
3. When the 72-Hour Deadline Cannot Be Met
If there are justifiable reasons preventing notification within the prescribed timeframe, the organization must notify the PDPC as soon as possible, no later than 15 days, accompanied by an explanation for the delay.
How to Notify the PDPC
What Every Organization Should Have in Place
Read the full consultation: pdpc.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/PDPC-consultation-46.pdf
This article is part of the LAS Legal Knowledge Hub - Learn more at kelomn.com
Scaling the business on a solid foundation, without having to go back and repair old structures
The "UP" stage is when a business is ready to scale whether by opening new branches, expanding into new markets, forming joint ventures, or preparing for a new round of investment. Growth of this kind is only sustainable when the three foundational pillars Share, Shield, and Control are strong enough to support it.
Why UP Matters
If Share is unclear, existing partners or investors may hold understandings of their roles and rights that conflict with the new structure. If Shield is weak, expansion may amplify the scale of legal risk along with it. And if Control is insufficient, preparing data and documents for review by financial institutions, investors, or partners becomes a resource-heavy burden one that can delay or derail critical deals.
Business owners and investors can often see growth opportunities clearly. But an equally important question is: "Is the internal structure ready to support that opportunity?"
What Makes UP Possible
UP does not happen in isolation. It is the product of Share + Shield + Control working together.
Share is clear → All parties understand their roles and rights when the structure evolves
Shield is strong → The business expands without expanding legal risk
Control is systematic → Information is ready for review the moment opportunity arrives
Viewing UP as the outcome of all three pillars ensures that expansion decisions are a genuine assessment of both opportunity and readiness enabling the business to grow without repeatedly returning to repair its original foundations.